|
Matter
Management for Legal Departments
Essential Features to Maximize Your Return on Investment
Author: Matt Ryan, Senior Consultant Copyright © 2008 Legal Files Software, Inc.
Contents:
Introduction
System Scalability and Reliability
E-mail and Calendar Integration
Document Management
Advanced Features
Software Evaluation Checklist
Introduction
Legal departments seek to take advantage of the latest technology in order
to better manage the growing diversity of elements which comprise their
matters: e-mail, documents, calendars, ticklers, contacts, litigation,
contracts, vendor management, e-billing for outside counsel fees, etc.
Matter management software, when properly selected and implemented, can
help legal departments increase effectiveness and reduce costs by taking
all these separate “pieces” and integrating them into a single,
matter-centric collaboration tool.
Commercially available corporate matter management systems have existed
since the 1980s. Since then, the number of software providers offering
a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) legal matter management solution has
increased substantially. Today, law departments looking for an in-house
legal matter management solution could easily develop a list of dozens
of packages to consider by searching for “matter management software”
using their favorite Internet search engine.
While some packages are easy to eliminate because they were designed specifically
for a law firm, or a law firm that deals only in personal injury, bankruptcy
or immigration, a long list still remains from which to choose the correct
system for your legal department. To complicate matters further, the maturity
of the products makes a feature-by-feature comparison of two or more programs
a time-consuming task that reveals no clear “winner” in the
contest.
While very few law department matter management COTS software providers
will admit it, the simple fact is that all these systems perform about
80 percent of the same functions. Differences in user interfaces and the
number of mouse clicks it takes to perform a given task are clearly important
aspects to consider when selecting a system since these two items alone
can determine the fate of a matter management implementation. However,
these items alone should not formulate your decision to purchase one product
over another. A portion of your evaluation time should be spent on the
20 percent of the “not-so-obvious” functionality that can
provide an enormous return on investment in both time and internal information
technology resource savings.
This paper will attempt to highlight several of these important features
that, more often than not, are overlooked during the software evaluation
process. Some of these items are features, both simple and advanced, while
some are probably more appropriately categorized as technical traits of
a software system. Whether functional or technical, these features are
by no means an inclusive list of everything that should be considered
when selecting a matter management system. Instead, items listed in this
document that are appropriate for your legal department should be combined
with your own unique matter management requirements to help you purchase
the solution that will provide the largest return on investment for your
department over the long run.
The features discussed are arranged into sections by categories. The end
of each section includes a checklist of the items discussed that can be
used as part of a software evaluation form. A complete checklist is included
at the end of this paper for convenience.
top
System Scalability and Reliability
While being a software vendor’s largest customer may have benefits
when things are going well, the tradeoff in headaches from a performance
and reliability standpoint are hardly worth it. The extra money a legal
department might save by going with a system originally built for the
small-to-medium law firm market can be wiped out the first time the system
goes down or the entire system runs poorly after the 25th concurrent user
logs in. The second time it happens, it simply costs the legal department
money in lost productivity.
One of the biggest “unseen” differences in matter management
products is the efficiency of the applications programming. Inefficient
programs will require a much larger database server, workstations, and
network throughput or bandwidth in order for the application to operate
with reasonable response times. All these inefficiencies translate into
additional costs that a legal department must incur in order to utilize
the application and can evolve into much larger issues as the system is
rolled out to more and more users.
While it is difficult to tell how efficient a program is during a software
demonstration, there are several things to look for and ask about when
evaluating a program. One of the most obvious is to ask each vendor for
the recommended server and workstation configurations that would realistically
support the number of users being considered. Large workstation and server
requirements should raise a flag. Applications that require a separate
dedicated server should raise another flag as this could signal a non-standard
implementation of standard programming techniques that could cause future
support headaches and compatibility problems.
Another not-so-obvious question that should be asked is the development
history of the application being considered. Many legal matter management
applications began as a desktop application that ran against a desktop
database. The lack of scalability and inefficiencies of these applications
forced some of these vendors to offer a version of their application that
will run against a true SQL relational database system such as Microsoft
SQL Server. While a vendor may tell you that these “new” systems
were a completely new development effort, chances are code was “borrowed”
from their old desktop applications, carrying forward some of the inherent
problems of their old systems.
In short, legal departments need to consider applications that were designed
specifically for a SQL relational database management system from vendors
with proven installations much larger than the number of users that will
be deployed. In order to ensure the matter management system will be able
to grow with the department, a good rule of thumb is to insist that the
vendor provide a reference for an established customer with a least four
to five times the total number of users needed at the legal department.
If this reference can confirm an acceptable performance of the application
with no considerable down time or system crashes, the application should
perform equally well or even better in an installation only 20 to 25 percent
as large and minimize the information technology costs associated with
poorly designed systems.
The following checklist includes important questions to ask all vendors
pertaining to the scalability and reliability of the system being considered.
Scalability and Reliability Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
| Recommended database server for an installation with
_____ users. |
|
|
|
| Recommended workstation specifications including CPU,
RAM and disk requirements. |
|
|
|
| Was the product ORIGINALLY developed to run on a SQL
relational database management system? |
|
|
|
| Size of the vendor’s largest installation. |
|
|
|
| Is the vendor willing to provide this installation
as a reference? If so, please provide a contact name and phone number.
|
|
|
|
Note:
Additional references of similar legal departments should also be requested
from each vendor.
top
E-mail and Calendar Integration
Microsoft Outlook/Exchange continues to increase its market share in the
legal marketplace. In legal departments that have chosen this platform
for e-mail, calendaring, and even contact management, Outlook is most
likely the primary application the legal department’s staff utilizes
to perform their duties and communicate with clients. The good news for
these legal departments is that most COTS matter management applications
include some level of integration with Outlook and/or Exchange so users
do not have to abandon Outlook in order to use a new system. If your legal
department uses IBM’s Lotus Notes or Novell GroupWise, be sure that
the matter management systems you consider integrate these e-mail systems.
While most matter management vendors offer integration with Outlook, how
this integration is programmatically accomplished, and the level of integration
varies greatly from vendor to vendor. For instance, most vendors offer
integration between the matter management system’s calendar and
the Outlook calendar. However, fewer vendors offer true, two-way integration
between calendaring systems that enables users to continue to use their
Outlook calendar as their primary calendar. While functional items such
as this should become apparent during a vendor’s software demonstration,
other items surrounding the integration may not be discovered until after
a product selection has been made and a contract executed.
The Exchange e-mail server is an organization’s information technology
hub. If there is any doubt to this statement, try and remember the loss
in productivity the last time e-mail was not available, and internal and
external communication was interrupted. For this reason, legal departments
should avoid products that require direct integration with the Exchange
server. In many instances, integration with the Exchange server creates
an additional workload and storage requirement on this vital resource
that can cost the organization significant money in upgrades. More importantly,
however, is that integration directly with the Exchange server often means
bypassing or disabling important security settings in Exchange that would
expose the entire organization to viruses or hackers. The potential costs
to a legal department for lost communications and work product, in addition
to the time lost because the e-mail server is down would be difficult
to quantify. As such, this type of integration should be avoided and legal
departments should never allow third-party applications to integrate directly
with their Exchange server.
Instead, e-mail, calendar, contact and task integrations with the matter
management system should all take place within the Outlook desktop. This
minimizes the security risk for the entire organization, while still achieving
the integration needed by the end users. As an added benefit, this type
of integration is often easier to install and maintain, in addition to
the peace of mind it will provide.
Another item to consider is how the matter management system stores case/matter
related e-mails and e-mail attachments. Since some solutions simply create
a “link” to the message stored in Outlook or Exchange, the
message can never be deleted (purposefully or accidentally) from within
Outlook or this link will be broken. Additionally, legal departments can
find themselves having capacity and performance problems on the Exchange
server since e-mails are never removed from the system. Ideally, your
matter management system should store e-mail and all associated attachments
in its own data store in their native formats.
The following checklist includes important questions to ask all vendors
pertaining to their software integrations with Microsoft Outlook.
E-mail and Calendar Integration Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
Does vendor’s application require
integration directly with the Exchange server? |
|
|
|
Does the vendor offer true, two-way
integration between calendaring systems (Can appointments be created
and updated from either application)? |
|
|
|
Does the vendor offer true, two-way
integration between task/reminder systems (Can tasks and reminders
be created and updated from either application)? |
|
|
|
Does the vendor offer true, two-way
integration between contact systems (Can contacts be created and
updated from either application)? |
|
|
|
| If an e-mail is “saved” to a case/matter,
does it have to remain on the Outlook/Exchange server? |
|
|
|
Note:
While IBM’s Lotus Notes and Novell GroupWise are not as prevalent
in the marketplace as they once were, some vendors also offer integration
with these e-mail systems. Even though the security and virus threat is
not as great, legal departments using Lotus Notes or GroupWise should
insist on a desktop integration with these products, as well.
top
Document Management
Many organizations and their legal departments have already invested in
a dedicated document management system (DMS) to manage, organize and protect
the legal department’s work product and documents. For departments
that have not yet invested in this technology, many COTS matter management
systems include a document management feature. Additionally, legal departments
considering a DMS implementation should also consider a matter management
system that offers this functionality, since matter management can provide
a number of useful tools for little or no difference in cost.
If a document management component offered by a matter management vendor
is going to be considered, several important items must be considered
during the evaluation process. First and foremost is how the matter management
system stores and manages documents. Legal departments should make sure
the matter management system actually “manages” the storage
of the document and does not simply maintain a link to the related document.
Applications that simply maintain a link to a document that has already
been saved in a user-specified location do not provide the legal department
with enough control over these documents. If one user saves documents
to a network drive and another user saves documents to their local drive,
a matter management system that maintains links to documents does provide
a method to access these documents, independent of where they are stored.
However, the availability of documents will most certainly become an issue
because if the user who stores documents locally does not turn on his/her
computer on for the day, or if he/she utilizes a laptop computer and happens
to be out of the office, these documents will be unavailable for every
user of the system.
In order to solve this problem, a document management system should take
the responsibility of saving the physical file away from the end user.
Documents should be stored in a central location on a network drive or
as actual records inside the relational database management system. An
easy-to-use interface should allow users to “profile” the
document by relating it to a case/matter and categorizing the document
according to legal department policies. The matter management system should
also programmatically manage all document saves and accesses independent
of the document type (Word, Word Perfect, PDF, etc.).
For organizations that have an existing investment in a document management
system, many matter management vendors offer integrations with these programs.
This makes it possible to access case/matter related documents stored
in the third-party DMS application directly from the matter management
system’s user interface. If this approach is selected, legal departments
must be sure that the selected matter management vendor has an official
partnership agreement with their DMS vendor so your integration will continue
to work with new releases of the DMS solution. Additionally, an official
partnership relationship also means that your matter management vendor
has built their integration using approved methods and tools provided
by the DMS vendor, and document security is not compromised.
A legal department’s specific document management requirements will
expand beyond the items covered in this section. The following checklist
includes important questions to ask all vendors pertaining to their software's
document management capabilities. Selecting a vendor who meets these basic
requirements will provide a greater return on your matter management investment.
Document
Management Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
| Does vendor’s application include a complete
document management component OR integrate with the existing DMS application?
|
|
|
|
| If integration with the existing DMS is desired, is
the vendor an official partner with the DMS vendor? |
|
|
|
| If the matter management system will be utilized as
a DMS, does the application manage the storage of documents? |
|
|
|
| If the matter management system will be utilized as
a DMS, can the application store any document/file type along with
a document profile (metadata)? |
|
|
|
top
Advanced Features
Many matter management systems have become very feature rich and it’s
these added features, the 20 percent discussed earlier in this paper,
which truly sets one vendor’s product apart from the others. Since
it would require an unrealistic amount of time in order to fully understand
every single feature offered in every COTS product you are evaluating,
this section highlights some of the more important “advanced”
features that have a high return on investment, but are not included in
all products.
While a simple and direct user interface will be apparent during software
demonstrations, having a program that is easy to navigate does not always
insure the implementation will be a success. A legal department which
deals with many types of issues has a wide range of needs that must be
met from a single matter management software program. As an example, a
legal department’s contract matters will have different business
and information requirements than its employment or litigation matters.
Therefore, it is vital to purchase a system that provides enough flexibility
to manage all matter types. This is especially important as legal departments
seek ways to track an increasing variety of compliance and regulatory
issues.
A matter management system should be viewed through the eyes of all users.
This includes users from every group in the department that will be utilizing
the application. To minimize the risk that a particular group or team
will not utilize the application, the matter management system should
be flexible enough to allow for customization of the interface and all
case/matter types for each group. This will mean that users will view
unique information screens, depending on the matter type (i.e., contracts,
leases, M&A, IP, trademark, securities etc.). This will simplify the
system for all users, reduce the training time required, and increase
the user adoption rate of the matter management application.
When an application does not provide a means to capture all the data needed
for employees to do their jobs, employees get creative. They turn to Word
documents, spreadsheets or pen and paper, and grow frustrated with the
application since it does not do what the users need. This significantly
impacts productivity, limits the usage of this data, and often means that
the data is not being backed up on a regular basis, further exposing the
legal department to losses. The selected matter management system should
be flexible enough to allow for the creation of customized screens that
can be used to capture all data and information required by the user or
client. Ideally, the vendor will offer a tool so this task can be accomplished
by non-technical staff, so the task of customizing and maintaining the
system does not fall 100 percent on information technology personnel.
Some corporate legal software systems include modules for tracking outside
counsel fees. During your package evaluation process, look for a matter
management program which can easily tailor the invoice review process
to match your law department’s workflow requirements for entering
e-invoices and invoice approval.
Another feature that is often overlooked during the initial evaluation
and selection process is how well the application can deal with the “exceptions”
to the normal business processes. These can be as simple as re-assigning
workload when an employee resigns from the organization to handling last-minute
requests for information or a report.
If the selected matter management system does not include functionality
to quickly re-assign workload from one user to another, or it takes an
employee an entire day or more to manually update the application, the
true cost of the matter management system just increased. Likewise, if
the matter management system does not have an easy way to export information
in the desired format to create a report a particular individual requested,
the amount of time it will take to produce this report using some other
means could be significant.
While it is impossible to predict every possible exception that may arise,
a matter management system should be advanced enough to handle a majority
of these items. The following checklist includes important features to
consider during your matter management selection process.
Advanced
Features Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
| Can the vendor’s application be “customized”
to meet the needs of each group or matter type? |
|
|
|
| Does the vendor’s application allow for “customized”
windows or screens? |
|
|
|
| Can all “customization” be performed by
non-technical staff with minimal training? |
|
|
|
| Does the vendor’s application include the ability
to easily re-assign workload between users? |
|
|
|
| Does the vendor’s application include the ability
to easily export data into other applications? |
|
|
|
top
Software Evaluation Checklist
The following checklist can be utilized during the software evaluation
process to ensure the items discussed in this paper are not overlooked.
A legal department’s own unique requirements should be added to
this list in order to provide a complete evaluation process.
Scalability and Reliability Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
| Recommended database server for an installation with
_____ users. |
|
|
|
| Recommended workstation specifications including CPU,
RAM and disk requirements. |
|
|
|
| Was the product ORIGINALLY developed to run on a SQL
relational database management system? |
|
|
|
| Size of the vendor’s largest installation. |
|
|
|
| Is the vendor willing to provide this installation
as a reference? If so, please provide a contact name and phone number.
|
|
|
|
E-mail and
Calendar Integration Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
Does vendor’s application require
integration directly with the Exchange server? |
|
|
|
Does the vendor offer true, two-way
integration between calendaring systems (Can appointments be created
and updated from either application)? |
|
|
|
Does the vendor offer true, two-way
integration between task/reminder systems (Can tasks and reminders
be created and updated from either application)? |
|
|
|
Does the vendor offer true, two-way
integration between contact systems (Can contacts be created and
updated from either application)? |
|
|
|
| If an e-mail is “saved” to a case/matter,
does it have to remain on the Outlook/Exchange server? |
|
|
|
Document
Management Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
| Does vendor’s application include a complete
document management component OR integrate with the existing DMS application?
|
|
|
|
| If integration with the existing DMS is desired, is
the vendor an official partner with the DMS vendor? |
|
|
|
| If the matter management system will be utilized as
a DMS, does the application manage the storage of documents? |
|
|
|
| If the matter management system will be utilized as
a DMS, can the application store any document/file type along with
a document profile (metadata)? |
|
|
|
Advanced
Features Checklist
| Feature |
Vendor A |
Vendor B |
Vendor C |
| Can the vendor’s application be “customized”
to meet the needs of each group or matter type? |
|
|
|
| Does the vendor’s application allow for “customized”
windows or screens? |
|
|
|
| Can all “customization” be performed by
non-technical staff with minimal training? |
|
|
|
| Does the vendor’s application include the ability
to easily re-assign workload between users? |
|
|
|
| Does the vendor’s application include the ability
to easily export data into other applications? |
|
|
|
top
|